It’s @D4DBoston time! (@ MIT Stata Center (Building 32)) 4sq.com/11U6Ntu

@ircmaxell where do they belong? They belong somewhere

@ircmaxell but can be discouraging to keep comments if majority of them are site related, not content related

@ircmaxell as it turns out, when I redesigned, addressed those issues, got more productive comments. They have a place

@ircmaxell off topic, yes. Spam, no. I find on blogs, comment sections tend to double as general site discussion, so still related

@ircmaxell that sounds like “censor”. Don’t like removing comments unless they are spam or truly offensive/

@ircmaxell fucking people commenting on font size instead of adding to the conversation. Almost dropped comments b/c that

My solution to @filamentgroup’s element query problem as well as CSS Viewport prefixing have been added to Toolkit

github.com/Team-Sass/toolkit

@chriseppstein agreed. With functionality finished, we can then discuss semantics.

@chriseppstein how about @Snugug $foo :p

@chriseppstein shush you. Not entirely happy w/syntax, but can’t think of something better. Functionality > syntax

@chriseppstein what if I had a mixin called mixin? Stupid, yes, but legal

@chriseppstein oh, pfft, I’m an idiot. Maybe Sass isn’t as ingrained as we thought! Moar time here than! Still not happy w/include mixin foo

@chriseppstein if its going to be like for and each, maybe an @mixin directive instead of overloading @include?

@kenwoodworth :\ ok. We’ll hang out tomorrow

@chriseppstein …one for strings/selectors, one for var maps, one for mixins, one for functions

@chriseppstein that makes me shutter a bit. Sure you want to introduce and entirely new syntax for this? That means 4 syntaxes for interp…

@kenwoodworth yes it is. Sounds good

@kenwoodworth actually, there’s a place called beer hour by me

@kenwoodworth haha, no. Everything’s like a 10-15 min walk north of me

@filamentgroup @RWD @scottjehl :\ ok. If you guys are ever in NYC, lemme know. Also, be sure to check out @SassConf this October!

@kenwoodworth haha. That’s the other side of MIT from me (at the Hyatt), but yah, would be happy to get together for a little bit.

@kenwoodworth what’s the address at Johnny’s?

@chriseppstein @include also resembles MQ and selector interpolation. We’re really talking about int from vars as main use case, not strings

@chriseppstein so [@include](https://twitter.com/include/) mixin($foo, [arglist])? Think that’s cleaner than @include #{$foo}([arglist])? I think the later is better DX